Cost savings is one of the primary benefits of offshore development, but it’s important to understand the true costs associated with each model. This blog post will explore the differences in cost between offshore development and local development, including considerations for time spent and quality assurance.
Cost Savings
The overall cost of offshore development can be more affordable than local development because there are many options available for outsourcing various services at a lower cost than what it would take to hire an individual or team on-site. This can include not only labor costs, but also technology and infrastructure costs. For example, companies may be able to rent space in another country’s data centers instead of building their own.
Time Spent
Time spent is another key factor when considering cost differences between offshore and local development. Offshore teams may require more up-front management and communication efforts and additional time spent managing different cultural expectations and language barriers. However, these issues can quickly be overcome with the right practices in place – such as using project management software for setting tasks and deadlines which ensure that everyone is on track.
Quality Assurance
Quality assurance (QA) is also a major concern when it comes to comparing the costs of offshore versus local development. While there are some advantages to having an experienced QA team located near your project site, overseas developers often need extra attention to make sure they meet expected standards – which can increase both labor costs and risk level during deployment. Additionally, if any issues arise during deployment or post launch, it can take longer to resolve them due to geographical distance between teams.
Long-term Maintenance
Finally, when comparing costs between offshore and local development models, it’s important to consider long-term maintenance requirements as well. With offshore development teams relying on remote resources for their support needs such as bug fixes or updates, there may be an added expense that is not initially factored into the overall budget. Additionally, depending on the size of your project or product scope, you may find that having an in-house team present could save you money in the long run by cutting out repeat expenses related to offshoring services every time changes are needed to your product or service offering.
In conclusion, when deciding whether or not to go with an offshore versus a local development approach – it’s important to weigh all factors involved before making a decision based solely on cost savings alone. Taking into account considerations like up-front management needs along with potential quality assurance risks could help firms make a more informed decision while ensuring they get the most value out of their investment regardless of which approach they choose.
